About Me

Name: Rich
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Another Liberal crisis ends with a whimper? No HIV/AIDS epidemic unless you are a homosexual, prostitute or intravenious drug user, of course.

Remember all the headlines about how HIV/AIDS was going to destroy all of us? Remember the hough and cry for funds to combat the spread of the AIDS virus? Remember the HIPPA laws that restricted even family members from knowing if a spouse or child had AIDS? Remember the rush by the media to say that AIDS wasn't just about homosexual behavior but about heterosexuals too? Remember the concerts, Hollywood elite wearing pink ribbons, and the politicians spending billions of our dollars to help prevent the spread of AIDS?

Well guess what, forget about it. According to Fox News, the World Health Organization admits the threat of a global AIDS epidemic is over.

The head of the World Health Organization’s HIV/AIDS department has officially admitted for the first time that there will be no global epidemic of the disease among the heterosexual population outside Africa, The Independent reported.

Kevin de Kock said global prevention strategies to address AIDS as a risk to all populations, among the WHO and major AIDS organizations, may have been misdirected. It is now recognized that, with the exception of sub-Saharan African, it is confined to high-risk groups.

These groups include men who have sex with other men, drug users who inject with needles, and sex workers and their clients, The Independent reported.

“It is very unlikely there will be a heterosexual epidemic in other countries,” de Kock is quoted in The Independent. “Ten years ago a lot of people were saying there would be a generalized epidemic in Asia — China was the big worry with its huge population. That doesn't look likely. But we have to be careful. As an epidemiologist it is better to describe what we can measure. There could be small outbreaks in some areas.”

However, AIDS still kills more adults than all wars, and is winning against current efforts to address it, The Independent reported. A WHO/U.N. AIDS report published in June shows less than a third of people in developing countries who need anti-retroviral drugs are receiving them. There were 33 million people living with HIV in 2007.

Some AIDS organizations, including the WHO, U.N. AIDS and the Global Fund have been blasted for inflating estimates of the number of people infected, taking much-needed funds from other diseases like malaria, spending it on the wrong efforts such as abstinence programs rather than condoms.

One result of the WHO’s admission may be that the vast sums of money spent on AIDS education for people who are not at risk may now be concentrated on high-risk groups.

There you have it. The effort was "misdirected". We spent billions on what? Wait, now WHO says we can now spend those billions on "high-risk groups" meaning homosexuals, prostitutes, and intravenous drug users. Great news. NOT!

Let's spend those billions on building strong traditional families. Anyone thinking of that???

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive